• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Professional Educator Standards Board

A-Z Topic Index

facebook logoteal twitter iconyoutube logo
  • Home
  • Educator pathways
    • Educators of the Deaf and visually impaired
    • First peoples’ language, culture, and oral traditions certification
    • Alternative routes to teacher certification
      • Find an alternative route program
    • Becoming an educator
      • Find a preparation program
      • Find an endorsement offering
    • Recruiting Washington Teachers (RWT)
      • RWT curriculum and resources
      • RWT reports
  • Current educators
    • Assignment
      • Educational staff associates
      • Endorsements
      • Teacher
    • Certificate renewal
      • Clock hours
      • Educational leadership
      • Educator standards, SEL, CCDEI
      • Equity-based school practices
      • Government-to-government relations
      • Professional growth plans (PGPs)
      • Providers for educational leadership and equity requirements
      • STEM integration
      • Suicide prevention training
    • Human resources
      • Educator conduct
    • District workforce data
    • Educator shortage
  • Preparation programs
    • Approval
      • Become a new program
      • Change an approved program
      • Course approval
      • Offer an endorsement
    • Review
      • Initial review
      • Curriculum and instruction review
      • Indicator-based review
      • Program review results
    • Standards and requirements
      • Educator assessments
      • Endorsement competencies
      • Field placement plans
      • Instructional topic requirements
      • PEAB
      • PGP for program completion
      • Program standards
      • Role standards
    • Support for Educator Preparation Programs
  • Paraeducator program
    • District implementation
      • Paraeducator training reimbursement
    • Minimum employment requirements
    • Program components
  • Resources & reports
    • Reports
    • Data portal
    • Handouts
    • Online learning
    • Professional Learning
  • Innovation to policy
    • CCDEI standards
    • Equity initiatives
    • “Grow Your Own” Initiative
    • Innovation archive
    • Workgroups
      • Advancing equity workgroup
      • Computer science specialty endorsement
      • Educational interpreters for the deaf
      • Educator professional growth
      • Fundamental Course of Study Workgroup
      • Interveners for the DeafBlind
      • Professional educator collaborative
      • Standards, Approval, and Review (SAR) Committee
    • Grants & pilots
      • Advancing equity grant
      • Alternative routes block grant
      • Educational Interpreter Grant
      • ESD alternative routes grant
      • Expanding computer science for elementary educators
      • “Grow Your Own” Pilot Program
      • LEADER initiative
      • Multiple measures pilot for the edTPA
      • Recruiting Washington Teachers – Bilingual Educators Initiative
      • Recruiting Washington Teachers
      • Teaching equity grant
    • Legislative affairs
      • Legislative updates
  • About us
    • Contact us
    • COVID-19 guidance
    • News
    • Rule making
    • Strategic plan
    • Job opportunities
    • Board meetings
      • Previous Paraeducator Board meetings and materials
      • Previous PESB meetings and materials
    • Who we are
      • About the Professional Educator Standards Board
      • About the Paraeducator Board
You are here: Home / Preparation programs / Standards and requirements / Educator assessments / Performance / edTPA policy

edTPA policy

The Professional Educator Standards Board sets policy for Washington’s edTPA performance assessment. The table below reflects the policy decisions which have been made by the Board and applied to Washington programs and candidates.

Policy decisions made to date

 Policy  Board meeting
 Established Board’s plan for use of field trial data related to all or portions of edTPA as initially consequential to candidates  September 2011
 Approved award of clock hours for educators scoring the edTPA  January 2012
 Determined continued use of the existing performance-based pedagogy assessment for purposes of adding endorsements via pathway 2 until March 2016. In the meantime, charged staff with searching for other measures of working with Stanford on use of portions of edTPA for this purpose  March 2012
 Established an unlimited retake policy  May 2012
 Candidates are assigned to either the literacy or mathematics elementary education edTPA. Data of institutions’ balance of edTPA literacy and mathematics will be delivered to the Board annually.  Updated May 2013
 Pre-service candidates exiting their teacher preparation program with multiple endorsements are required to take one edTPA in one of the endorsements they are seeking. Board approved the recommendations for the edTPA alignment table (spreadsheet), with the understanding the tables are recommendations and not requirements. The Board will be updated with stakeholders’ feedback in one year. Staff were directed to prepare scenarios (top 5 frequently combined endorsements) which might guide candidates who are contemplating exiting their program with multiple endorsements.  March 2013
 Board confirmed edTPA consequential date of January 2014 for all pre-service candidates. Some subjects will be consequential beginning January 2014:

  • Elementary literacy
  • Elementary math
  • Early Childhood Education
  • Secondary Math
  • Secondary ELA
  • Secondary science
  • Secondary history/social studies
  • K12 performing arts
  • Special education
  • K12 physical education
  • World language

Candidates will continue to submit portfolios in all areas so assessments may be scored and institutions will use vendor scores to determine if candidates have satisfactorily met the assessment requirement for program completion.

 September 2013
 Institutions will provide a scenario document (document) for candidates exiting a program with multiple endorsements as guidance for candidates.  September 2013
 During the November meeting, the following items were approved by the Board:

  • The Student Voice rubrics will not be consequential for candidates but
    • Candidates will continue to submit portfolios that address the Student Voice prompts
    • Vendor will continue to score Student Voice rubrics
    • Staff will return annually with Student Voice data
    • Members will consider taking action on Student Voice rubrics in three years.
  • The passing score for the edTPA is 35 and will be consequential beginning January 2014.
  • The passing score for the world language and classical language edTPAs will be 30 and will be consequential beginning January 2014.

During the July 2015 meeting, the following was adopted by the Board:

  • The passing score for the edTPA will be 35 during the 2015/16 and 2016/17 academic year. World and classical language edTPAs will be 30.
  • The passing score for the edTPA will be raised to 40 beginning the 2017/18 academic year . World and classical language edTPAs will be 34.
  • Student Voice will continue to not be consequential for candidates but
    • Candidates will continue to submit portfolios that address the Student Voice prompts
    • Vendor will continue to score Student Voice rubrics
    • Student Voice committee will return with their recommendations for the Board’s consideration at the September 2015 meeting.

During the May 2018 meeting, the Board decided that Student Voice rubrics will be consequential and count toward the final scores of edTPA beginning Fall 2019.

During the July 2018 meeting, the Board approved the following:

  • The new passing score for edTPA inclusive of Student Voice rubrics will be 47 (41 for world languages and classical languages) beginning Fall 2019.
  • The following additional areas will become consequential beginning Fall 2019.
    • Agricultural Education
    • Family and Consumer Science
    • Health Education
    • Visual Arts

During the July 2019 meeting, the Board decided that Student Voice rubrics will be consequential and count toward the final scores of edTPA beginning September 2020.

During November 2019 board meeting, members from the Professional Educator Standards Board approved eliminating the Student Voice rubrics from edTPA, effective Fall 2020.

 November 2013

 Update July 2015

 Update May/July 2018

Update July  2019

 Update November  2019

 Amendment to WAC 181-78A-264 and WAC 181-78A-270:

 WAC 181-78A-264 1 (f)(i) A:
Programs shall administer the ((pedagogy)) teacher performance assessment adopted by the professional educator standards board to all candidates in a residency certificate program.

 WAC 181-78A-270 (1) (d) Performance assessment:
Beginning January 1,2014, all candidates will complete and pass the teacher performance assessment per WAC 181-78A-264 as authorized by the professional educator standards board: Provided, that candidates who participated in the teacher performance assessment field trials or took the pedagogy assessment prior to January 1, 2014, may be recommended for certification by the preparation program.

November 2013 (emergency rule adopted)
March 2014 (Adopted as a permanent rule.)
Condition code policy:
SCALE has released their recommendation for a condition code policy. This will be brought to the Board for their consideration during their November 2014 meeting.
For more information on SCALE’s recommendation, please visit condition code policy (PDF).
Per Board directives at the November 2014 meeting, this item will be brought forward for the members to consideration again during the 2015 year.
This is now a SCALE policy not a state policy.
Rounding of total score policy (PDF): The total is the sum of all rubric scores. In cases of a .5 score of the total edTPA score level (e.g. 39.5), the total edTPA score will be rounded up to the next higher whole number. This was not a Board decision but a edTPA national policy.
 2016 Student Voice committee recommendations:
The Student Voice committee made final recommendations regarding the Student Voice prompts and rubrics at the January 2016 Board meeting. This included the timeline for when the rubrics will be consequential and count towards pre-service teacher candidates final score.2018 Student Voice revising committee recommendations:
During the 2018 May Board meeting, the Board decided that Student Voice rubrics will be consequential and count toward the final scores of edTPA beginning Fall 2019. The Board also approved the recommendations from the Student Soice revising committee. This includes recommendations regarding the revised Student Voice rubrics and prompts as well as related policies around support for programs and candidates, edTPA retakes, score reports, and condition code determination.
For a list of the adopted recommendations, please visit the 2016 Student Voice committee recommendations (document) and the 2018 Student Voice committee recommendations (folder).

Primary Sidebar

  • Preparation programs
    • Approval
      • Become a new program
      • Change an approved program
      • Course approval
      • Offer an endorsement
    • Review
      • Initial review
      • Curriculum and instruction review
      • Indicator-based review
        • Annual reporting
          • Data administrators
        • Teacher and principal program indicators
      • Program review results
        • Teacher preparation program reports
        • Principal preparation program reports
    • Standards and requirements
      • Educator assessments
        • Assessments resource hub
        • Basic Skills
          • WEST-B exemptions and equivalent assessments
        • Content knowledge
          • WEST-E/NES equivalent tests
        • Performance
          • edTPA coordinators
          • edTPA policy
      • Endorsement competencies
        • National standards and competencies adoption
      • Field placement plans
      • Instructional topic requirements
        • Issues of abuse
        • Paraeducator supervision and support
        • John McCoy (lulilaš) Since Time Immemorial (STI)
        • Social Emotional Learning (SEL)
        • Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program (TPEP)
      • PEAB
      • PGP for program completion
      • Program standards
        • PEAB
      • Role standards
    • Support for Educator Preparation Programs

Footer

Seal of the state of Washington

Professional Educator Standards Board

Old Capitol Building
600 Washington Street SE
Olympia, WA 98504-7236

PESB@k12.wa.us
Paraboard@k12.wa.us

(360) 725-6275

STAY UPDATED

Sign up with your email address to receive news and event information.

Copyright © 2025 · Staff Intranet