PESB staff will be sending out updates and policy adoptions as new information is available.
Student Voice related policy change in 2019-2020
At the May 2018 Board meeting, the Board decided to make Student Voice (SV) rubrics consequential beginning Fall 2019 to allow program providers enough time to communicate with their candidates regarding the new edTPA passing scores that will include SV rubrics. The timeline of SV rubrics related changes are summarized in the following table:
(Submissions after August 16, 2018)
(Submissions after August 15, 2019)
|Consequentialilty of SV rubrics||No change. SV rubrics scores will NOT be consequential||SV rubrics scores will become consequential.|
|SV handbook / rubrics||SV prompts will be updated in handbooks. (No revisions in rubrics)||No change. The updated SV handbooks (2018-2019 version) will be in use continuously.|
|Retakes||No change. Submitting SV rubrics related prompts is optional for single or multiple retake(s).||SV rubrics should be scored as part of task-based retakes. Candidates need to respond to a corresponding SV prompt when they retake a task, and that SV rubric will be scored as part of the retake.|
|Condition code||No change. SV rubrics do not count towards incomplete rule.||“Incomplete” definition will be inclusive of SV rubrics.|
|Score report||No change. SV rubrics appear at the end of the score profile.||Each relevant Student Voice rubric score will be inserted at the end of each task for the individual score reports.|
Policy decisions that have been made to date
|Established Board’s plan for use of field trial data related to all or portions of edTPA as initially consequential to candidates||September 2011|
|Approved award of clock hours for educators scoring the edTPA||January 2012|
|Determined continued use of the existing performance-based pedagogy assessment for purposes of adding endorsements via pathway 2 until March 2016. In the meantime, charged staff with searching for other measures of working with Stanford on use of portions of edTPA for this purpose||March 2012|
|Established an unlimited retake policy||May 2012|
|Candidates are assigned to either the literacy or mathematics elementary education edTPA. Data of institutions’ balance of edTPA literacy and mathematics will be delivered to the Board annually.||Updated May 2013|
|Pre-service candidates exiting their teacher preparation program with multiple endorsements are required to take one edTPA in one of the endorsements they are seeking. Board approved the recommendations for the edTPA alignment table (spreadsheet), with the understanding the tables are recommendations and not requirements. The Board will be updated with stakeholders’ feedback in one year. Staff were directed to prepare scenarios (top 5 frequently combined endorsements) which might guide candidates who are contemplating exiting their program with multiple endorsements.||March 2013|
| Board confirmed edTPA consequential date of January 2014 for all pre-service candidates. Some subjects will be consequential beginning January 2014:
Candidates will continue to submit portfolios in all areas so assessments may be scored and institutions will use vendor scores to determine if candidates have satisfactorily met the assessment requirement for program completion.
|Institutions will provide a scenario document (document) for candidates exiting a program with multiple endorsements as guidance for candidates.||September 2013|
| During the November meeting the following items were approved by the Board:
During the July 2015 meeting the following was adopted by the Board:
During the May 2018 Board meeting, the Board decided that Student Voice rubrics will be consequential and count toward the final scores of edTPA beginning Fall 2019.
During the July 2018 Board meeting, the Board approved the following:
Update July 2015
Update May/July 2018
Amendment to WAC 181-78A-264 and WAC 181-78A-270:
WAC 181-78A-264 1 (f)(i) A:
WAC 181-78A-270 (1) (d) Performance assessment:
|November 2013 (emergency rule adopted)
March 2014 (Adopted as a permanent rule.)
| Condition code policy:
SCALE has released their recommendation for a condition code policy. This will be brought to the Board for their consideration during their November 2014 meeting.
For more information on SCALE’s recommendation, please visit condition code policy (PDF).
|Per Board directives at the November 2014 meeting, this item will be brought forward for the members to consideration again during the 2015 year.
This is now a SCALE policy not a state policy.
|Rounding of total score policy (PDF): The total is the sum of all rubric scores. In cases of a .5 score of the total edTPA score level (e.g. 39.5), the total edTPA score will be rounded up to the next higher whole number.||This was not a Board decision but a edTPA national policy.|
| 2016 Student Voice committee recommendations:
The Student Voice committee made final recommendations regarding the Student Voice prompts and rubrics at the January 2016 Board meeting. This included the timeline for when the rubrics will be consequential and count towards pre-service teacher candidates final score.2018 Student Voice revising committee recommendations:
During the 2018 May Board meeting, the Board decided that Student Voice rubrics will be consequential and count toward the final scores of edTPA beginning Fall 2019. The Board also approved the recommendations from the Student Soice revising committee. This includes recommendations regarding the revised Student Voice rubrics and prompts as well as related policies around support for programs and candidates, edTPA retakes, score reports, and condition code determination.
|For a list of the adopted recommendations, please visit the 2016 Student Voice committee recommendations (document) and the 2018 Student Voice committee recommendations (folder).|