Indicator | Definition | Status | Timeline for completion | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Admissions rate | % of applicants admitted | Developing | Fall 2017 | |
Rigor relevance, quality of faculty and staff, peer interactions, performance-based assessments | % of graduates who agree or strongly agree | Developing | Spring 2017 | Each of these items is a separate indicator, according to UCEA. |
Graduation rate | % of starters who complete and are recommended for licensure | Completed | Winter 2016 | |
Licensure rate | % who become licensed | Developing | Spring 2016 | PESB is gathering data from other states that have undertaken a performance assessment for leaders, per Board request in March 2016. |
Placement rate | % of graduates who become assistant principal (AP)/principal within three years of graduation in state | Completed | Winter 2016 | |
Retention rate | % of cumulative graduates retained as AP/Principal for 3+ years in state | Completed | Winter 2016 | |
School climate | % of graduates who improve school climate after two years of leadership | Developing | Fall 2017 | PESB hopes to partner with the Title II office of OSPI; that office already collects this data. |
PEAB | TBD | Planning | Fall 2017 | PESB plans to build upon partnership surveys from other NTEP states to develop an instrument. |
Partnerships | TBD | Planning | Fall 2017 | PESB plans to build upon partnership surveys from other NTEP states to develop an instrument. |
Candidate/completer diversity |
A comparison of the number and percentage of program completers in the most recent graduating cohorts – disaggregated by race/ethnicity, linguistic diversity, gender, and SES – with the number and percentage of candidates originally admitted in those same cohorts; and The extent to which the population of principal candidates in an EPP reflects the diversity of the larger student population on the same campus. The program completion rate is the ratio of (a) the number of individuals who complete a principal preparation program or who pass state licensure examinations in a given year to |
Developing | Spring 2016 | Board tasked staff with identifying ways to collect data regarding all aspects of the Technical Advisory Committee’s (TAC) definition at the May 2016 Board meeting. Board added this indicator for Principal programs during the May 2016 Board meeting. |